Skip to content
degreedividend.
Independent college researchBuilt on federal dataNo rankings for sale

Head-to-head comparison

Auguste Escoffier School of Culinary Arts-Boulder vs Emily Griffith Technical College: which has better ROI?

Private for-profit, Boulder CO · vs · Public, Denver CO

Option A Boulder, CO

Auguste Escoffier School of Culinary Arts-Boulder

Net price / year
$13,367
Earnings, 10 years
$32,001
Payback
No payback

Option B Denver, CO

Emily Griffith Technical College

Net price / year
$7,197
Earnings, 10 years
$35,487
Payback
No payback
The verdict

Neither clears its cost on institution-wide earnings, but Emily Griffith Technical College comes closer — median earnings $35,487 against a $28,788 total, vs $32,001 at Auguste Escoffier School of Culinary Arts-Boulder. (Scorecard, 2026 · our math.)

Share
Head to head
MeasureAuguste Escoffier School of Culinary Arts-BoulderEmily Griffith Technical College
Net price / yr$13,367$7,197
Total net cost$53,468$28,788
Median earnings, 10 yrs$32,001$35,487
Median debt$9,653—
Payback——
20-year net return-$380,648-$286,248

College Scorecard (2026), institution-level · payback and returns are our math. Figures blend all majors.

The short answer

Which is cheaper, Auguste Escoffier School of Culinary Arts-Boulder or Emily Griffith Technical College?

Emily Griffith Technical College, at $7,197 a year after aid versus $13,367 — a gap of $6,170 a year, or $24,680 across the full degree. These are net prices after grants and scholarships, not sticker prices, so they reflect what an aided student pays.

The short answer

Do Auguste Escoffier School of Culinary Arts-Boulder or Emily Griffith Technical College graduates earn more?

Emily Griffith Technical College graduates report a median $35,487 ten years after entry, $3,486 more than the $32,001 at Auguste Escoffier School of Culinary Arts-Boulder. Both are institution-wide medians from federal tax records, so a high-paying major at the lower school can beat the average at the higher one.

The short answer

Which graduates more of its students?

97% of students finish at Emily Griffith Technical College, against 48% at Auguste Escoffier School of Culinary Arts-Boulder. Completion matters to the ROI arithmetic because a degree that is never finished still carries its cost and its debt, but earns none of the graduate premium above the $48,360 high-school baseline.

Auguste Escoffier School of Culinary Arts-Boulder vs Emily Griffith Technical College: frequently asked questions

Is Auguste Escoffier School of Culinary Arts-Boulder or Emily Griffith Technical College a better value?
Emily Griffith Technical College comes closer, but neither clears its cost on institution-wide earnings — the field you study decides it here more than the school.
Which is cheaper, Auguste Escoffier School of Culinary Arts-Boulder or Emily Griffith Technical College?
Emily Griffith Technical College: $7,197/yr net price after aid versus $13,367/yr at Auguste Escoffier School of Culinary Arts-Boulder — a difference of $6,170 a year, or about $24,680 over four years.
Do Auguste Escoffier School of Culinary Arts-Boulder or Emily Griffith Technical College graduates earn more?
Emily Griffith Technical College graduates earn a median $35,487 ten years after entry, versus $32,001 at Auguste Escoffier School of Culinary Arts-Boulder — a $3,486 gap. This blends every major, so a specific field can flip it.